Let me make this perfectly clear. Guilmero Del Toro is
without a doubt the richest voice to emerge in any medium in the genre of
horror during the period of time that this book discusses.
His is a deep, richly creative voice that blends a knowledge
of folklore that Neil Gaiman would find intimidating with a baroque visual
style that is down right sensual, with a deep humanistic sensibility and a
sheer love of story that is unmatched by his contemporaries. There are few
artists whose work I respond to in the deep instinctual way that I respond to Del
Toro’s.
And as luck would have it I am forced to write about the
only one of his films that can be called mediocre.
Believe me folks I tried, but Cronos, The Devil’s Backbone
and Pan’s Labrynith are all technically foreign productions and Blade 2 and his
two Hellboy films are just too action oriented to qualify. I’m stuck with the odd man out of Del
Toro’s filmography.
Mimic was Del Toro’s attempt to adapt to the Hollywood
system rather than the other way around. It is the only one of his films where
he doesn’t have story credit and it shows. The plot of Mimic would not be out
of place in any of the 50's Big Bug movies or Bert I. Gordon “Things are larger than
they should be” master work (Making it along with Andaconda one of the last
films to be old fashioned without being a throwback). One can easily imagine a
paternal Hugh Marlowe in a white lab with a touch of gray in his hair coat
mouthing most of the film’s dialogue (“My God They’re Getting BIGGER. If they
should spread there’d be no stopping them!”) Watching Del Toro’s elegant style
put in service of such a plot is frankly bizarre. Mimic becomes almost an
exercise in cogitative dissonance.
Mimic’s confused tone starts from frame one, with a
disturbing credit sequence that could be described as not unlike Se7en or a bit
more to the point, “One of those late 90’s credit sequences that totally ripped
off Se7en” which juxtaposes bugs with shots of dying children. I mean how else
are you going to start a big bug movie amirite? It’s just the first of many
examples of Del Toro treating the material with a solemnity that it all
together doesn’t deserve. Instead of elevating the material he just gets
dragged down along with it.
Now let me make myself clear, I’m not saying that Mimic is a
bad movie because “it’s just a big bug movie.” Del Toro himself would never
stoop to such condescension and I’m sure the man loves Big Bug Films. I’m sure
Del Toro could make an amazing big bug movie. He’s currently hard at work on
Pacific Rim which rumor has it is practically a Kaiju film. I’m saying that he
wasn’t given enough room to bend the material to his skill set. He was, in
short forced to make someone else’s big bug movie and the outcome was not
ideal.
It turns out the children are victims of a plague that is
being carried by New York’s many cockroaches. The CDC turns to entomologist
Susan Tyler (played by Mira Sorvino) who genetically engineers a predator bug
that takes care of the roach problem almost instantly until DUN DUH DAAAHHH!!!!
SOMETHING GOES WRONG!!!! Despite the best efforts of F. Murray Abraham to add
some gravitas to the joint (a note F. Murray Abraham is billed as making “a
special guest appearance” a few years later he would get Thirteen Ghosts all to
himself. Lucky Fellow) The film never gets remotely near surmounting the
goofiness inherent in the premise.
Sorvino discovers that her bugs have survived when they have
been engineered to die out. And wouldn’t you know it now they’ve grown to the
size of eight feet tall and they’re snacking on the homeless, street kids,
stray dogs and priests. Sorvino ventures into the deep abandoned Subways of New
York to try to elimate the living plague of mutants she has created. Results
are mixed.
As mentioned the odd thing about the film is that there is a
fair amount of Del Toro in this thing. The old subway station where most of the
film takes place is a great environment, baroque and haunted, a place of
dilapidated grandeur that reflects Del Toro’s obsession with underground
chambers and palaces. The film features one of his trademark courtly old world
grandfathers (no gears though). The sight of the bugs in their first form (The
film’s gimmick being that they have developed a kind of camouflage that allows
them to pass as human at a quick glance) is undeniably creepy. A large
shuffling mass with a face that is eerily just short of human. Indeed the bugs serve as a pretty good metaphor for the film as a whole. At first
glance they are gothic at disturbing. But once they reveal themselves they end
up just looking silly. Remember when I talked about how surprisingly well the
90’s CGI of The Frighteners has held up? Sadly that is not a statement I will
be making about Mimic.
The problem is that such idiosyncrasies that are the source
of such delight to Del Toro’s faithful are few and far between. For the most
part Del Toro is stuck delivering what the studio wants. Mimic is the only one
of Del Toro’s films that can be fairly called formulaic and Del Toro’s disdain
for said formula is laughably apparent, and includes both A) The most laughably
unconvincing flare up of maternal instinct I have ever seen in a film. Ellen
Ripley Mina Sorvino is not and B) The male lead walking away from the most unsurivable explosion lived through
that I have ever seen. As a man
who grew up on the films of the 80’s and 90’s I have seen more than my fair
share of giant explosions that miraculously leave the heroes unscathed. But I
have never, ever, seen one that was so sublimely unbelievable as the one that
ends Mimic. It’s as though Del Toro received a studio note, threw it on the
ground in disgust and then just decided to make it look as stupid as humanly
possible. If this is the case I commend you sir.
This is not a case like The Frighteners where an artists
voice stayed more or less intact in a hostile environment after a few
concessions. This is a complete override of said voice. Del Toro seemed to
realize as much and his next film was made A) 5 years later (one of the many
depressingly long ellipses in Del Toro’s career) and B) Financed in Spain. By
the time he returned to Hollywood it was on his own terms.
I don’t want to beat up much more on Mimic. It’s the worst kind of film to write
about a bad film by an artist you love. It’s only value being that it’s
creation basically prevented any more Mimics in Del Toro’s career. The project
left such a bad taste in his mouth that he willingly shut down his dream
project At The Mountains Of Madness, and stepped off The Hobbit rather than
compromise on either. Every preceding film from Del Toro has felt like a gift.
If the price of that is one you wish you could return that’s more than fair.

I like MIMIC a lot. Yeah, it has its faults but the Director's Cut on Blu-Ray is a definite improvement as it fleshes out the characters more. Y'know, the CGI in this film never bothered me all that much and doesn't draw attention to itself nearly as much as THE FRIGHTENERS as Del Toro managed to hide a lot of its flaws in shadows and dimly-lit scenes.
ReplyDelete@ JD: Sadly I couldn't find the DC for rent, though I'm definitely going to try and watch it before the second draft. I think the difference is that the CGI in The Frighteners is more stylized and cartoonish, thus the limitations aren't as noticeable, while the CGI in Mimic is supposed to be real so it ended up looking kind of distracting.
ReplyDelete